Technology

Deriving the Black-Scholes Equation

2025-05-08 03:26:52


Now that we have derived Ito's Lemma, we are in a position to derive the Black-Scholes equation.


Suppose we wish to price a vanilla European contingent claim C, on a time-varying asset S, which is set to mature at T. We shall assume that S follows a geometric Brownian motion with mean growth rate of μ and volatility σ. r will represent the continuously compounding risk-free interest rate. r, μ, and σ are not functions of time, t, or the asset price S, and so are fixed for the duration of the option's lifetime.


Since our option price, C, is a function of time t and the price of the asset S, we will use the notation C = C(S,t) to represent the price of the option. Note that we are assuming at this stage that C exists and is well-defined. We will later show this to be a justified claim.


The first step is to utilise Ito's Lemma on the function C(S,t) to give us an SDE:


dC=Ctdt+CS(S,t)dS+122CS2(S,t)dS2


Our asset price is modelled by a geometric Brownian motion, the expression for which is recalled here. Note that μ and σ are constant - i.e. not functions of S or t:


dS(t)=μS(t)dt+σS(t)dX(t)


We can substitute this expression into Ito's Lemma to obtain:


dC=(Ct(S,t)+μSCS(S,t)+12σ2S22CS2(S,t))dt+σSCS(S,t)dX


The thrust of our derivation argument will essentially be to say that a fully hedged portfolio, with all risk eliminated, will grow at the risk-free rate. Thus, we need to determine how our portfolio changes over time. Specifically, we are interested in the infinitesimal change of a mixture of a call option and a quantity of assets. The quantity will be denoted by Δ. Hence:


d(C+ΔS)=(Ct(S,t)+μSCS(S,t)+12σ2S22CS2(S,t)+ΔμS)dt+ΔS(CS+Δ)dX


This leads us to a choice for Δ, which will eliminate the term associated with the randomness. If we set Δ=CS(S,t) we receive:


d(C+ΔS)=(Ct(S,t)+12σ2S22CS2(S,t))dt


Note that we have glossed over the issue of what the derivative of Δ is. We will return to this later.


This technique is known as Delta-Hedging and provides us with a portfolio that is free of randomness. This is how we can apply the argument that it should grow at the risk-free rate; otherwise, as with our previous arguments, we would have an arbitrage opportunity. Hence, the growth rate of our delta-hedged portfolio must be equal to the continuously compounding risk-free rate, r. Thus, we are able to state that:


Ct(S,t)+12σ2S22CS2(S,t)=r(CSCS)


If we rearrange this equation, and using shorthand notation to drop the dependence on (S,t) we arrive at the famous Black-Scholes equation for the value of our contingent claim:


Ct+rSCS+12σ2S22CS2rC=0


Although we have derived the equation, we do not yet possess enough conditions in order to provide a unique solution. The equation is a second-order linear partial differential equation (PDE) and without boundary conditions (such as a payoff function for our contingent claim), we will not be able to solve it.


One payoff function we can use is that of a European call option struck at K. This has a payoff function at expiry, T, of:


C(S,T)=max(SK,0)


We are now in a position to solve the Black-Scholes equation.






Reference: Deriving the Black-Scholes Equation


From https://www.quantstart.com/articles/Deriving-the-Black-Scholes-Equation/

Leave a comment :